Task

Marks

A

B

C

D

Tasks
1/2/3

40%

• Extremely well-conceptualised
• Shows in-depth understanding of the task
• End products indicates immense effort taken
• End product have very clear direction
• End product are well-executed
• Group presents well and are able to show their emotional and intellectual readings of the text
• Group is able to justify their choices convincingly

• Concepts are strong
• Shows clear understanding of the task but lacks depth
• End product indicates group has taken substantial effort
• End product have clear direction with a little haziness
• Clear execution of the end product
• Group presents substantially well, lacking in coherence relating to their emotional and intellectual readings of the text
• Group is able to justify their choices to a sizeable extent

• Concepts are basic
• Lack of clear understanding of task, no depth
• End product indicates group took little effort
• End products are incoherent with no direction
• Execution of the end product is shabby
• Group presents in fragments, trying to relate their emotional and intellectual readings of the text
• Group tries to justify their choices to a small extent

• Concepts are irrelevant
• Task demands are not met, no understanding
• Minimal effort undertaken in creating the end product
• End products are incoherent and not serious
• Group presents in fragments, unable to relate their emotional and intellectual readings of the text
• Group justifies their choices to a negligible extent

Online Forum

20%

• Questions raised are well-thought through
• Responses display an in-depth and close reading of the text
• Language use is appropriate

• Questions raised are good
• Responses show close reading of the text
• Language use is appropriate, with a few slips

• Questions raised show that student is still on the surface level
• Responses shows attempts at close reading in some instances
• Language use is somewhat appropriate with use of some colloquial terms

• Questions raised are incoherent and on the surface level
• Responses display no close reading of the text
• Language is inappropriate, extremely colloquial

Reflections

40%

• Shows a clear and strong relation to the text
• Makes use of all the tasks executed in class to build on own understanding and opinions of the text
• Opinions are clearly stated and are backed by evidence from the text
• Extremely well-phrased and impeccable overall
• Minimal grammatical errors, language is very appropriate

• Shows a clear relation to the text
• Makes use of the tasks executed to build on opinion and understanding of text, lacks depth
• Opinions are clear and almost always backed by evidence from the text
• Well-phrased and coherent
• Few grammatical error, language is mostly appropriate

• Tries to relate to the text, mostly on the surface level
• Uses a few of the tasks executed to build on understanding of text
• Lacks opinion, backed by evidence from the text somewhat
• Language is somewhat appropriate with a sizeable amount of grammatical errors

• No attempts to relate to the text, narration of the text’s summary
• Displays no close reading of the text
• Makes minimal use of the tasks executed to build an opinion
• Lacks opinion, no evidence from the text
• Almost incoherent
• Language is not appropriate, gross grammatical errors